Teaching activities
Check the source before sharing
Source criticism online: check sender, date and purpose before using or sharing information.
A road is closed and the route must change. Learners interpret an operational message, estimate a new arrival time and inform passengers.
The driver receives conflicting information about a possible road closure. Learners assess sources, credibility and an AI-generated recommendation.
A convincing social media post on a health topic comes from an unknown source. Learners assess the sender, the claims and AI-generated answers. The case is about information literacy, not medical advice.
Learners compare a fictional source document with an AI-generated sample summary that contains a wrong value. Static material – no AI service is used.
Learners assess three fictional messages without real personal data and discuss digital judgement. The exercise does not replace legal advice, consent assessments or the employer’s own privacy procedures.
Learners assess a fictional email requesting changed payment details and look for signs of possible fraud.
Learners assess a fictional social media post with an undocumented claim about a food product (media literacy).
Learners compare two fictional product descriptions and write questions for the supplier. They are not asked to judge whether a product suits a real installation.
Learners compare two fictional messages about the same task, find the differences and ask for clarification in writing and orally.
Teaching activities
Source criticism online: check sender, date and purpose before using or sharing information.
Digital learning resources
Evaluate whether AI-generated information is correct and relevant before using it at work.
Teaching activities
A practical reading and writing exercise in which learners find information, compare details and formulate a question when something is unclear.
Teaching activities
Participants compare three fictional messages, distinguish claims from documentation and write a neutral, responsible message.